06.06.2026
elon musk — CA news
Elon Musk's recent court testimony has unveiled competitive tensions in the AI industry as he admits xAI utilized OpenAI models.

In a courtroom in California on April 30, 2026, Elon Musk made a significant admission during his trial against OpenAI. He indicated that his company, xAI, partially trained its Grok chatbot using models developed by OpenAI. This revelation underscores the competitive tensions simmering in the rapidly evolving AI landscape.

Musk co-founded OpenAI in 2015 as a non-profit organization, aiming to develop artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity. However, he left the organization in 2018 after a failed attempt to take control. His departure marked a shift in his relationship with OpenAI, which transitioned to a for-profit model under the leadership of Sam Altman and Greg Brockman.

During this ongoing trial, Musk is suing OpenAI and its executives for $134 billion. He claims this amount should be redirected to support OpenAI’s non-profit arm. His attorney stated that while Musk is not opposed to a for-profit structure, it must align with the original mission of benefiting humanity.

Musk’s testimony also included concerns about the potential dangers of AI. “The worst-case situation is where it is a terminator situation, where AI will kill us all,” he warned. Such statements reflect deep anxieties surrounding AI development and its implications for society.

As Musk navigates this complex legal battle, he highlighted that using distillation—a common practice in AI development—was part of how xAI refined its models. He stated, “It is standard practice to use other AIs to validate your AI.” This admission raises questions about intellectual property and ethical practices within the industry.

The trial is expected to last three weeks and will delve into OpenAI’s governance and operational decisions. The outcome could have lasting implications not just for Musk and his companies but also for how AI organizations are structured moving forward.

With Musk seeking substantial damages and emphasizing a return to non-profit ideals, the case illustrates broader tensions between profit motives and ethical considerations in technology. As these developments unfold, they will likely shape public discourse around artificial intelligence and its future role in society.